STAKEHOLDER VIDEO DECISION LOG
From Clipback: https://clipback.video/blog/handle-conflicting-video-feedback-multiple-stakeholders/

CONFLICT-RESOLUTION MESSAGE

Subject: Decision needed — [video / version], [timestamp]

Hi [client contact / decision-maker],

I have two requests for the same moment in [video / version]:
- [Reviewer A]: [original request and intended result].
- [Reviewer B]: [original request and intended result].

The decision needed is: [one clear question].
Option A: [change and its trade-off].
Option B: [change and its trade-off].

My recommendation is [option] because it supports
[agreed brief / audience / objective].

Please have [agreed decision-maker] confirm one instruction by
[date, time, time zone]. Please also identify any new deliverable
or change to the brief so we can agree its scope and schedule.

[If agreed: I can continue the unaffected items while this is pending.]

Thanks,
[Your name]

DECISION RECORD -- repeat for each disputed item

Project / video / version:
Timestamp or range (or Overall):
Original requests / reviewers / sources:
Shared objective or brief reference:
Decision-maker:
Agreed instruction and reason:
Treatment of the competing request:
Additional scope or schedule impact:
Decision date and source:
Editing status / verification in the next version:

CHECK BEFORE EDITING
[ ] The notes refer to the same moment and version.
[ ] Each reviewer's intended result is understood.
[ ] Facts, preferences, and new deliverables are distinguished.
[ ] The client has named the decision-maker.
[ ] One instruction is confirmed; the competing request is accounted for.
[ ] The next cut will identify what was actually implemented.

Suggested labels such as Needs decision and Ready to edit are for your
own decision list. A review tool does not choose the creative direction
or replace the client's agreed decision-maker.